Fired for Telling the Truth: Australia’s War on Doctors, Faith & Free Speech - E3

In this episode of Emeka Unscripted, Emeka Edwin-Nweze investigates how ideology is replacing science in Australia’s healthcare system, and why doctors are being punished for speaking the truth. When Dr Jillian Spencer, a respected psychiatrist, was suspended for challenging gender ideology, it exposed a crisis in healthcare ethics and free speech. Across Christian schools, hospitals, and government offices, professionals are now being silenced for protecting children and defending their faith. From faith freedom to pronoun controversies, from NAB job cuts and offshore jobs to political double standards, this episode reveals how cancel culture and woke culture are eroding trust in institutions, crushing dissent, and reshaping the very meaning of truth in Australian politics and healthcare.

What you’ll learn:

• How gender ideology reshaped Australian medicine and law

• The cost of free speech in today’s culture wars

• Why Christian schools and faith-based organisations face growing pressure

• The hypocrisy behind corporate virtue-signalling and NAB’s job cuts

• The role of medical ethics and faith freedom in defending truth

• Why public figures like Pauline Hanson, Charlie Kirk, and Sky News Australia are challenging this narrative

  This episode asks the hard question: If truth is punished and science is censored — what happens to freedom in Australia?

Transcript

I wanted to open our conversation today with the same madness that fires doctors for raising clinical concerns and is now suing a Christian school. Yeah. For refusing to bow to gender ideology. So today, we'll talk about Dr. Jillian, we'll talk about NAB cutting local roles while hiring offshore (fun fact, if you missed that news), and we'll talk about the NDIS rules that look good in theory but crushes the cash flow in practice. Well, maybe a lot more than crushing the cash flow, we'll talk about how it's ultimately very, very terrible for the Australian economy. Because the role here for me is to educate, enlighten, and empower. That's why we're here.

I'm Emeka and this is Emeka Unscripted. Let's get into the chat for today.

A senior Queensland child psychiatrist by the name of Dr. Jillian Spencer raised some concerns about the gender ideology that has been imposed on children right here in Queensland. Now the concerns that she raised were grounded in centuries of medical ethical clinical prudence. Our forefathers that have gone before us have taken their time to evaluate certain things about humanity and they've come up with what they have. But some people (who are administrators) started to infuse some new ideas into things and let's see how that goes. Now what she was warning about was the irreversible damage that is being done to children in the name of so-called gender affirming care for minors. Gender affirming care for minors. Why? Why are we affirming? The response to a clinical medical professional saying this is not okay is to fire her. Not because her science was wrong or because she's broken the oath that she took to care for humans to the best of her ability, but because she was warning that this isn't right and if that warning does not align with the ideology of the day (that is barely a decade old by the way), then she can no longer keep her job.

When there was no evidence-based response to beat the ideology, the response is to destroy the person who has seen through the ideology, and that is what we call nonsensical ideology. Not because I'm trying to insult you. I'm not trying to call you guys out with some kind of name, but this is just the reality. Because this is an ideology where the only response is to tear down the individual or have a plethora of insults thrown at them on the media, that then eventually leads to them being fired. That is called wokeism - an ideology that is now in charge and feels it can do whatever the heck it wants. That's just wild. Absolutely wild.

And just to quote the doctor, she said, “they're jumping the gun without waiting to establish whether the whistleblower claim is actually true. They're not waiting for the court to decide they are going ahead and firing me.”

So, let's get this straight: a doctor questions the practices that pushes the edge of ethical medicine and instead of debating the evidence, the system punishes her. Not because she's wrong, but because she refuses to match the beat of the ideology, the drum of some insanity really, that is in healthcare. That is called censorship. And let me be blunt: this is the moronic left wielding their sword of stupidity to end the human race. They cloak themselves in some kind of what they call compassion, but silence anyone who dares to question that their ideology might be a little bit off base (or rather way off base).

So let me quote the doctor again: “When I first raised the concerns in 2023, it was a culture of fear and silence. They are using the code of conduct to stop me from speaking about a medical scandal. I have to criticize the hospital because it is responsible for the medical scandal.”

You see, that is not just a critique of medicine; that's a warning about what happens when institutions replace science with dogma. If you don't know what that means, let me break it down for you. Science is meant to question itself. Science tests, challenges, corrects itself over time. Dogma shuts the questions down. It silences any challenges, and it chooses to punish anyone who disagrees. When you see a doctor told to keep quiet by the administrators, that means they care more about ideology than evidence. That is not medicine anymore. It is dogma. I'll make it plain and simple. Dogma doesn't heal people; it harms them. And if medicine forgets its one purpose is to heal and protect, then it stops being medicine and it just becomes malpractice. Plain and simple, you dumbass.

Okay, let me quote the doctor again. She says, “There is concerning ideological culture manifested in the excessive number of mental health staff being encouraged to wear pronouns badges and initiate conversations.”

My pronoun? What is your pronoun? Really? That's what we're having clinical staff do these days? Honestly, are you serious? Are you serious right now? What kind of mad world do we live in, where ideology is dressed up as some kind of health care symbolism that is mistaken for science? That is not science. What science is it actually for you to be asking somebody who is there for healthcare, “what is your pronoun?” And I'm sure some woke-ass human is going to come out of the woodwork and tell me how wrong I am - that it's science. But you have no actual factual basis for that. But if I'm wrong, go ahead and prove me that I'm wrong.

You see, the very system that is designed to protect the most vulnerable people is now experimenting on them like guinea pigs. This isn't medicine; this is performance and this is theater at the expense of humans. I quote the doctor again, “Don't we want doctors to speak up when there's harm being done to children?”

That's exactly the point. When clinicians are being punished for asking hard safety questions, we are heading down the wrong road. News flash. Because human survival to date has depended heavily on these intelligent human beings (clinicians, medical professionals) building up their knowledge base through scientific methods to improve the way they care for us. And if you want a health care system that actually protects its kids and support families, you have to protect the right to speak up, because that is what science is: to question, to push back and to call things out. And you have to do it so that the science can improve for humanity as a whole, including the very people that are fighting it. Not to pander to the loudmouth or the unhinged minority that couldn't care less about the value of human life as it seems, but to demand evidence that goes beyond the feel-good claims. Ask for proof for the long-term safety and sustainability. We need to be able to debate scientific ideas, not just silence them. Because at the end of the day, if silencing them is all that we care about (because there is some kind of ideological nomenclature that is behind what we are actually trying to achieve here, which is the long-term sustainability of humanity), we literally cannot improve or go forward. But here's the thing. If we can't debate these simple ideas out, if medical professionals can't simply say, "Let's pause for a second and consider whether this actually aligns with any scientific value” and you shut them down and you fire them, we're heading the wrong directions as humans.

So, what we need is no labels. No mobs. No silencing. Just fact that is based on truth that hasn't changed for centuries, like a man is a man and a woman is a woman.

A Catholic school group in Melbourne is now facing legal action because they refuse to use the non-binary teachers preferred pronouns. Yeah, that case is with the Fairwork Commission. So you can probably just Google that, because you can literally Google any case that is up with the Fairwork Commission, because it's a federal national thing. And I quote, "The Catholic organization argues that its religious doctrine and biblical values do not allow endorsement of gender identities outside of male and female."

Ah, yes. They do not allow this simple thing. That is literally the basis of their faith. You don't like it or perhaps your agenda is to get rid of all religion. What do we call that again? That's right: communism.

It is seems really clear that for the left, their methodology here is that they will not be satisfied ‘til religion is completely dead. Let them delete it from history and maybe even rewrite history so that humans just need to answer to themselves. Well, maybe more specifically, they just want to get rid of Christianity. Because it seems that all the left wants is for everybody to conform to their ideology and then supercharge it with political madness using political power to push the ideology.

Well, I’ve got good news for you. We're not going anywhere and we will not stand for it. And if you don't want to work in it, go elsewhere. Seriously, if you don't like it, find a different job at a public school or somewhere else that accepts your woke stance, you depraved degenerate.

Yeah. This is where hypocrisy bites, right? Because if political correctness demands that Christians compromise their convictions, why isn't the same standard applied to every other group? Think about it for a second. See, workplaces will happily push the DEI days. Everybody can wear rainbow merch to work for a day, but let me ask you to wear a “Jesus is Lord” t-shirt for one day to come to work. That’s what I thought. “Oh, no. That's going to impede on my faith, my ideology, because it's not a rainbow t-shirt, and it doesn't line up with the nonsense that I believe.” Oh, sorry. I'm mocking you. I did say I want you here, and I want you to listen, because perhaps I could help you think clearer.

See. The principle is this: you can't demand a faith institution denies its own foundation. Christianity's bedrock is in Genesis, right? “Male and female, He created them.” You can go look that up. It's like right at the start of the Bible. Dragging a religious school into court to force them into compliance with some nonsensical doctrine that contradicts its own creed isn't justice. It's actually state overreach. I don't even know why Fairwork is accepting this at all, because they should simply be saying what I just said: They're a Christian organization. If you want to work there, then you're going to have to abide by their principles. Right? The bedrock and foundations that they were built on. Don't like it? Like I said before, go the hell elsewhere.

And this links straight back to Dr. Jillian, because when ideology replaces truth, the same culture that fires doctors also sues churches. It's a different battlefield, but it's the same war. Just like I said two episodes ago, it's silence or comply. I'll call it what it is. It is not compassion in any way. It is not progress. It is absolute corruption at its finest and the devil persuading institutions to betray the their own convictions under the banner of care. No. Just no.

Go elsewhere because this is just utterly ridiculous.

Anyway, before we move on, I should give a shout out to our sponsor for the day, NVT: Neta Virtual Team. It was birthed out of the desire to partner with Australian businesses for success. Neta Virtual Team gives a fair go to small and medium Aussie businesses by giving them access to the global workforce. Finally, they're helping Aussie businesses scale and providing cost effective and excellent employment. That allows your business to reinvest back into the excellence that it needs for the Australian environment. Imagine what your team could look like with a fresh global perspective. Imagine the growth you could experience with the right team around you. That's Neta Virtual Team. Do reach out to them.

Now let's move on to the world of banking, if you want to see how policy makers enrich their friends in high places. Let's take a look at a story with NAB. You can look it up yourself because that is what I encourage. Recently, NAB announced 410 Australian role cuts in the tech and enterprise space within the company. At the same time, they are creating 127 new roles offshore in India and Vietnam. According to the articles, NAB axes more than 400 jobs while creating 120 plus roles offshore. 400 Australians lose their livelihood. But you know what? Good job, mate. Spreadsheet looks great, because overseas labor is way cheaper then the fines.

NAB cops a $15.5 million fine for failing to respond to the hardship claims. Sounds massive, right? Huge fines. 15.5 million. Whopping, massive amounts. Yeah. Remember when I talked in the last episode about the distraction and the games that they play when they're doing this over here and they do this over here so you get a bit distracted. Because this is one of them. NAB's net income in 2024 was $6.98 billion. Yep. That's a huge fine, right? $15.5m. Right next to $6.98 billion. That is 0.22% of their profit. Yep. That amount is so small, it's literally just a rounding error. It's the kind of amount that anybody wouldn’t even notice that is missing from their spreadsheet. Not joking. That's how small it is to them.

If any other employer at the medium to small business kind of size (because let's face it, the giants, they do this stuff all the time) - if any of them were to sack that many people all at once and shipped their jobs overseas, the penalties would be crippling - like enough to shut them down entirely. Not to talk about the policies that'll be instantly enacted quick fast against them.

But you know when the bank does it, they distract you with a great press release. See, we fine them, penalize them, a whopping $15.5m. They wouldn't even. That would teach them. Yeah, sure. But let's compare that fine with their profits or what they save by moving all these jobs overseas. The theater is literally meaningless and you, well, you are the audience. You're watching the show while the real trick is happening offside stage. A slight of hand right in front of you and they show you the penalty, while the other hand pockets the real winnings. That's all it is. It's a distraction for you. All the while, the government is pickpocketing from the right where you're sitting at the theater, and you don't even notice because who praised the price? You! Okay?

Look. I'm an employer too, so I get it. With tight margins and the insane employment cost in Australia, I'd absolutely be tempted to do the same. But here's the point: If NAB with billions in profit still offshores to make the maths work, what chances do small businesses have in Australia? Small businesses don't have billions of dollars to cushion them. No, they don't have overseas hub to hide costs. Their only lever is literally to pass the pressure to you: the customer, the patient, or the client. That's why I'm saying that you pay the price when these things happen.

Which brings us to healthcare, especially the NDIS, where most providers are small operators. And in this government controlled model you are forced to be entirely dependent on the government, because the government controls your income with price limits and they dictate to you your biggest cost (which is wages, the leave, the compliance). That's not fairness. That's not partnership. That's freaking tyranny in disguise. Yeah. That's right, Albo. I am calling your government nothing but a tyrannical mob with an agenda against its own people.

It's a different story. Each one of these seem like different stories, but it is the same pattern. Ideology over evidence. Theater over truth. A short-term game over long-term survival of humanity. Sustainability? Well. Who gives a damn?

The only way we move forward is to educate yourself. Get enlightened because you have to be able to think for yourself.

Let everything I have told you today be something that you take away and you use to think for yourself. Google it. Don't just take my word for it. Don't let the media spill whatever narrative they want in you. Believe it. Challenge it. Then act on it.

Because if we don't, we're screwed.

I'm Emeka. This is Emeka Unscripted. That's it for the show today. Godspeed.

Related articles: